Challenge: My S&W Sigma .40VE vs. your Glock

I'd have to say I've shot both and while a smith owner enthusiast myself, own a 4043, a 37P, a 586 and a 686, I would have to give this one to the glock. I am not a huge fan of glocks, but as much grief as everyone gives them, they are exceptional guns. Rarely if ever malfunction and shoot well, but it all comes down to a matter of preference. I feel as if the 57 lb. trigger pull on the sigmas is a major downfall for this gun. Being that the keys to accurate and repeatable shooting with a handgun is grip, sighting, and "trigger squeeze", this rough, long, hard trigger makes it "more" difficult to acheive repeatable accurate results. Not to say that it can't be done, but I don't like a gun that I have to "get used to". why buy a gun if it's going to take u 6 months to become proficient with it? I do believe that the sigmas have the potential to be decent guns with a good trigger job, but anyone expecting to get the same results shooting an entry level handgun like the sigma as they do with a top level gun like a glock is in for a surprise. This is why s&w made the sigma, to be an entry level, inexpensive alternative to the more expensive models. In the end, you get what you pay for. Accurate shooting to me isn't tearing up a cinder block at 10 yards, it's grouping like I do with my model 37, silver dollar at 10 yards. Do that with your sigma and then maybe I'll make the trip to wisconsin to show you up with a borrowed glock.