This might strike you as an odd thread title, but let me explain:
My first gun was a CZ 452 FS in .22LR. I bought it because it was an outstanding value for its price. Fit and finish were top notch, the gun was accurate out of the box, and the whole package was an awesome value. Very classic looks, what with the full stock and bolt action. I shoot it standing unsupported, so while I'm sure there are more expensive guns that are more accurate in a benchrest, I never shoot in a benchrest, so it's a moot point for me.
Taurus seems to strike me as the CZ of the pistol world. Excellent quality, fit and finish, accurate out of the box, classic looks (Colt 1911!) and excellent value. I have heard that their quality control is poor, but I don't know if it's just brand-hating or legitimate.
As you may have guessed, I'm looking at something in .45 ACP. Do y'all think that the Taurus is a good buy?
Cameron
My first gun was a CZ 452 FS in .22LR. I bought it because it was an outstanding value for its price. Fit and finish were top notch, the gun was accurate out of the box, and the whole package was an awesome value. Very classic looks, what with the full stock and bolt action. I shoot it standing unsupported, so while I'm sure there are more expensive guns that are more accurate in a benchrest, I never shoot in a benchrest, so it's a moot point for me.
Taurus seems to strike me as the CZ of the pistol world. Excellent quality, fit and finish, accurate out of the box, classic looks (Colt 1911!) and excellent value. I have heard that their quality control is poor, but I don't know if it's just brand-hating or legitimate.
As you may have guessed, I'm looking at something in .45 ACP. Do y'all think that the Taurus is a good buy?
Cameron